Toll-free:

Do you have
any questions?

http://marvelousessays.com/

Hamlet as a Tragic Hero

Main menu

Discounts

the plagiarism

Latest posts

We accept

Buy custom Hamlet as a Tragic Hero essay

Shakespeare presents Hamlet as a tragic hero. He has smart traits to qualify to be a hero. For example, this character is daring and brave. This is portrayed by the fact that he takes a high risk by going to England. In case his plan failed, this character would be executed in England. Hamlet also comes out as a loyal person in that he remains loyal to his father. He gets angry because of his father’s death and, thus he remains angry at his mother and Claudius for killing his father. Hamlet also comes out as an intelligent person when he pretends to be insane to be able to gather the necessary information regarding Claudius.

He, however, had a flaw since he could not move on whenever he wanted. Hamlet continued attending school even as an adult for failure to move on with life. It also took him a long time to stop grieving his father’s death simply because he could not move past that. Finally, when he managed to stop grieving, Hamlet could not kill Claudius. He continued to pretend that he was mad even after confirming that Claudius caused his father’s death. Hamlet could not accomplish many things. He did not marry Ophelia even after dating her for a long time. The audience pities Hamlet for his parents’ death, and the fact that he loved his parents such that he became hurt by the changes that took place. Hamlet’s failure to move over one thing led to his death. He is killed using a poisoned sword. He had several opportunities to deal with Claudius but he made a decision being a tragic hero.

The tragedy of Hamlet is an enigma. At one time, Hamlet should kill the king, but the play portrays him as a failure since he is unable to kill him. Some people argue that Hamlet fails to revenge because his inner feelings do not permit him. He seems to be weak willed. It could also be that the task placed on his shoulders was heavy for him. Other critics argue that Shakespeare wanted to show tragedy of a person who is weak willed, and at the same time poorly equipped. Other critics argue that Hamlet fails to kill the king because of the obstacles he comes across as he tries to accomplish his goal. Opposition from the king and his people makes proves difficult to kill the king at once. These critics believe that Hamlet’s aim was not to kill the king, but to chastise him and expose him for his guilt.

Two things happen at the end of the tragedy. Hamlet kills the king alongside four other victims. The audience gets surprised since they did not expect that to happen. Reasons behind the killing of the killing are so obvious such that the audience has forgotten the initial reason for revenge. People do not hear the death of Hamlet’s father in the end of the play. The king gets killed as a result of different reasons from vengeance. The tragedy, therefore, reaches its catastrophe. The king’s death, however, is overshadowed by several immediate causes and several other deaths. These killings are different from other killings that had occurred, previously, in the tragedy. Most of the previous deaths happened but was not noticed. The queen also dies, and people do not seem to notice. We only see Hamlet biding him farewell (Shakespeare 58).

Hamlet’s death also gets overshadowed and blurred. After his death, he is no longer remembered. The tragedy can be explained by two formulas. First, we shall use the formula of the story where Hamlet avenges his father’s death by killing the king. According to the formula of the plot, Hamlet does not kill the king for that reason but for different reasons other than vengeance. This contradiction is part of the play by Shakespeare who intended to express himself by teasing the audience’s emotions. The tragedy fulfills its task set from the beginning, but it keeps on deviating. The audience realizes later that it came from a very different direction. The reasons that prevented Hamlet from killing the king, led to the death of the king. The catastrophe gets to a point of contradiction when the play is interrupted by irrational events. However, the mystery and obscurity come from the author.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the play’s contradiction revolves around the story, plot, and the dramatis. These three factors develop differently. Hamlet makes feelings of the audience move to two levels. First, one can see the goal of the tragedy and secondly the digressions arise. After the king’s death, the death of Hamlet, the protagonist, attracts people immediately. This gives the spectator understand the contradictions and conflicts that existed throughout the play. Different people give different reasons for Hamlet’s delay or failure to act. Some say that the task given to him was tough for him to tackle. Others believe that that Hamlet was a coward with some other critics arguing that Hamlet was an imaginary person since he had long died even before the start of the play. However, we have found out that it was the author’s tactic to bring out the message intended to give his audience. He, however, manages to kill the King at the end of the play, though he appears to have killed him for different reasons rather than vengeance for his father’s death.

Buy custom Hamlet as a Tragic Hero essay

Related essays

 

Get 15% off your first custom essay order.

Order now

PRICES
from $12.99/PAGE
X

Tell a friend